here
are your candidates' views on the arts
parkdale-high park
CONSERVATIVE PARTY
GREEN PARTY
LIBERAL PARTY
NDP PARTY
Conservative Party
Jurij Klufas
jurij@klufas.ca
www.klufas.ca
416-239-3887 |
There is no question that the arts are a fundamental
part of a civilized and enhanced life. In my personal life (used
to study and teach violin), family life (children study piano,
ballet, theatre), professional (TV production) as well as community
activities (Festival production) the arts play an important
part in our lives and I do believe that we must have a healthy
arts sector in Canada. |
Green Party
Neil Spiegel
voteneil@spiegel.ca
Website
416-533-2030
|
1. What role do the arts play in your
life?
My wife Ann is a documentary film maker and I have pitched
films with her. For her arts are a fundamental part of her
life. Both documentary film and the poetry and writing that
she does. For myself I have had a lot of fun developing a
film idea with her that we hope to make over the coming year.
I also have interests in Guitar and have historically been
interested in drawing, mostly life drawing.
2. What role do the arts play in keeping people healthy?
Art is everything that we do that has value to us beyond pure
survival or economic life. It is in essence what we do with
our lives. I personally define Art quite broadly and think
of it as a component of everyone’s lives. A better question
would be: Can we be healthy or happy without art?
3. Why is it important that Toronto have a healthy arts
sector?
People are attracted to places with good arts scenes. It fills
their lives up. If we want to attract creative people in the
business sector, good city planners, great chefs, doctors,
lawyers, tailors, candlestick makers, we need to have a thriving
arts scene. Why do you think San Francisco was the home of
the dot com explosion? It was because the city had a vibrancy
that attracted artists and creative business people.
4. Does your party believe that Canadian content and
ownership should be protected in our broadcasting industry?
Yes, but, the Green Party has no illusions about the modern
media world and corporate globalization. What good are "Canadian
ownership" rules that empower crooks living in London,
England, who just happen to hold Canadian citizenship? What
good are "Canadian content" rules that don't apply
to the Internet? These rules are in need of some serious reform.
We'd like to expand the diversity of Canadian content, not
just force people to watch it: more creative independent TV
and radio broadcasts, more cooperation between the public
broadcaster (CBC/RadioCanada) and community groups, and above
all, availability in many more languages: in Toronto, even
just in Scarborough, we Canadians have a hundred languages,
forty religions, and very little of that diversity is reflected
in what actually gets to the air.
The best way to protect Canadian ownership and content is
to open up broadcasting to many small players, who might broadcast
to no more than a few neighbourhoods, to treat television
a bit more like the Internet. There are dozens of unused UHF
channels and millions of TVs ready to receive them. Why are
they unused? Obsolete regulations and vested interests. The
Greens view cultural diversity as the best way to protect
biological diversity, and would like more chaos in the game.
5. Our artists help make our society prosperous, yet
many of them work and live in relative poverty. How can the
Federal Government assist in returning some of that prosperity
to our artists?
Remove all income tax from artists or anyone else living below
the poverty line. Guarantee basic housing and plain healthy
food as social and economic rights, which Canada signed a
treaty to protect in 1976 but has never implemented.
Move arts funding down from large scale projects to community
based projects.
Consider revamping charges for for-profit broadcast rights
as a use of stable funding for the arts.
6. Do you support federal investment in Canada's arts
sector?
Yes. Strengthen support for CBC radio. Expand CBC televisions
role as a news and information network and direct it away
from commercial programming.
a. Does investment in the arts produce a health dividend?
An educational dividend? A public safety dividend?
Health costs are reduced when people seek artistic collaboration
or involvement to feel involved and connected, rather than
going to their doctors for company or sympathy (which is
a surprisingly common phenomenon).
Education costs are reduced when people learn and more
quickly find what interests them via entertainment. How
many people learn most or all of their history from movies?
And what works of art, like Uncle Tom's Cabin, have changed
society and raised consciousness?
Public safety is obviously improved with more eyes on the
street later at night. Would you rather be on a well-lit
main drag at midnight with hundreds of people around, dozens
of whom are employed on that street and lose their livelihood
if the street becomes unsafe? Or on some deserted suburban
wasteland street? It's obvious. When people have a unique
advantage from living in a community, and art is about just
that uniqueness, they defend that community, and they defend
it ferociously.
b. If elected, would you vote to increase funding
to the arts sector through The Canada Council? Through Department
of Canadian Heritage?
The Canada Council is a good program, but it would be easier
to fund if it had clear objectives in terms of social capital*,
individual talent (or "individual capital"*),
instructional capital* like techniques and courses, that
were expected to emerge from its investments in the arts.
These would provide at least a way to answer "what
value is created", without trying to reduce it to financial
terms (which would be futile).
c. Do you support provision of stable, adequate, multi-year
arts funding?
Secure funding of these programs across many administrations
is required to ensure the arts they support survive; that
will not be achieved if a single Auditor-General's report
can bring the whole thing crashing down. So accounting and
accountability is actually key to keeping federal funds
flowing into the arts - once implemented, value reporting
standards are hard to change, and a hostile administration
in Ottawa would find it too much bother to challenge and
change a good system of identifying capital assets and intangibles
in the arts.
Greens will make such funding invincible, by making it
defensible to a point that is rational. We can talk about
numbers of copyrighted original creative works, for instance,
or number of live events (paid or not) or even number of
audience-hours which were watching or number of participant-hours.
We will not try to reduce the art itself to just numbers,
but, there are things we can do to account for its human
impact.
|
Liberal Party
Sarmite Bulte, M.P.
bultes@teammartin.ca
www.sarmitebulte.ca
416-533-8300
|
click for response from
Liberal Party Head Office |
NDP Party
Peggy Nash
peggy@peggynash.ca
www.peggynash.ca
416-769-2200
|
1. What role do the arts play in your
life?
I have a degree in French literature, have worked in independent
filmmaking and have organized literary initiatives at the
CAW. I believe strongly in an independent Canadian culture,
given the fact that we live next door to the most powerful
country in the world. It is important that our federal government
invest in the arts to ensure that a diversity of Canadian
voices is heard, at home and internationally.
2. What role do the arts play in keeping people healthy?
The identity that we build with our literature, filmmaking,
performing arts, painting and visual arts allows us to develop
a common outlook on the world and ourselves. In telling our
stories, the arts provide a shared experience and allow us
to dream. Along with helping to reaffirm our place and experience
in the world, specific use of the arts in health treatments
such as art therapy, reduction of risk behaviors among youth
and the healing process achieved through words, books, dramatic
improvisation and music, are well-recognized.
3. Why is it important that Toronto have a healthy arts
sector?
Arts and culture are a vital economic engine for our communities,
city and country. Our city’s cultural wealth is a key
factor in attracting tourism and giving Toronto a high-profile,
international status. Just as important, our arts sector is
a major source of employment for over 190,000 people in Toronto
who work as individual artists, in small businesses and in
larger cultural institutions and industries
4. Does your party believe that Canadian content and
ownership should be protected in our broadcasting industry?
Yes. Public broadcasting is a key part of that protection.
While the Liberals have slashed the CBC’s budget by
20 percent over the last decade, the NDP will increase and
stabilize funding for the CBC and Radio-Canada, recognizing
the importance of public broadcasting in our large country.
Under the Liberals, media concentration has continued to increase.
The NDP would protect domestic ownership of cable and communications
companies, and ensure more diversity of voices in media by
preventing further mergers and acquisitions that provide media
owners with more than 20 percent market share in a national,
regional or local market. The NDP would also order the CRTC
to enforce responsibility in the cable TV industry, get a
handle on fee hikes, deal with the reduction of community
access programming and rebalance regulations to put viewers’
interests first.
5. Our artists help make our society prosperous, yet
many of them work and live in relative poverty. How can the
Federal Government assist in returning some of that prosperity
to our artists?
First, the NDP will ensure stable, long-term funding for all
current programs receiving funds from the federal government—the
only political party to make this commitment. Programs like
FACTOR, that administer funds to launch new Canadian music
artists, provide the additional resources that artists need
to plan and build their careers. The NDP will support Canadians
visual and performing artists through project-based grants
and tax credits. We will ensure that all Canadians who make
less than $15,000 a year pay no federal income tax. Affordable
housing is another key area where we will provide support.
The NDP will start a 10 year national housing program to build
200,000 housing units and co-ops, renovate 100,000 existing
units and provide rent supplements to 40,000 low-income tenants.
We will also remove the GST from family essentials including
medications, books and magazines, children’s clothing
and school supplies to make life more affordable for working
people.
6. Do you support federal investment in Canada’s
arts sector? Does investment in the arts produce a health
dividend? An educational dividend? A public safety dividend?
If elected, would you vote to increase funding to the arts
sector through The Canada Council? Through Department of Canadian
Heritage? Do you support provision of stable, adequate, multi-year
arts funding?
Yes. The NDP will lock in all federal arts and culture funding
and guarantee a 3 percent increase per year on all currently
allocated funds to cover inflation. As well, we will infuse
an additional $240 million per year over the next two years
for Canadian culture, and increase that to $340 million additional
funds by 2007.
Our arts, culture and media are vital to preserving our cultural
sovereignty and independence as a nation. Investment in this
sector continues to show dividends. For example, FACTOR has
proved that a modest $8 million annual investment can have
a huge payback in terms of building Canadian independent music
talent, launching Canadian artists and generating significant
revenues for the industry and our economy, measured in the
hundreds of millions of dollars.
Dividends go beyond measured economic returns. What goes
unmeasured are the benefits of art therapy and the healing
provided by words, books, music, visual and performing arts.
These disciplines continue to provide innovative ways of educating
our youth, both academically and in relation to social issues
like drug and alcohol abuse and other risk behaviors.
Just as we’ve seen with health care, it has been a
practice of the current Liberal government to provide ad hock
funding for the arts. This kind of practice leads to instability.
The NDP believes in stabilizing funding over the long term
as a more respectful way to build strong relationships and
allow artists to plan their careers.
|
|
|
|